He says that even the inventor of the MNA vaccine deposits. Is that correct at all one can refute this?
No matter what he says. Depending on how old you are you do not need vaccination. Just look in the statistics. 85% of the deceased were over 70, younger people had in most cases pre-existence.
And you protect themselves with vaccination only. You do not even need this protection.
The man is not world famous. He is an arbitrary wit figure.
Malone is not inventor of the mRNA vaccines. He is CO (!) - Author on a publication from the 90s involved in the development of RNA vaccines. To put this in relation: More than 480 scientists have contributed to more than 60 publications on the development of RNA vaccines. Malone was on one of them and there only a minor figure. Alleine with the claim "inventors" of the RNA vaccine, he is already disqualified itself.
Believe you should have the clear data: the vaccines are safe and effective.
The vaccines have undergone all phases of clinical trials and completed with excellent values in terms of safety and effectiveness. The data from these studies are peer-reviewed:
In addition, this data was examined as part of the approval procedure of various independent drug authorities. Their EXperten commissions have confirmed this data, which is why vaccines have been granted:https://www.fda.gov/emergency-preparedness-and-response/coronavirus-diaSeas-2019-covid-19 /pfizer-biontech-covid-19-Vaccine#
are extremely rare and make much more frequent at CovID-19 on.
Long-term damage is extremely rare for vaccines. As rally that they usually can not be documented before approval. When long-term sequence EDDBeing, damn, this also happens in other vaccines only as part of the Phase 4, the pharmacovigilance after approval. A good source is this blog article:https://www.deplatformdiaSease.com/blog/long-term-effects-of-covid-19-vaccines-should-youb -WORIED
Delta likes to easily reduce the protection of vaccinated, to infect an almost 60% lower risk, the vaccinations continue to be effective and a valuable tool to reduce the spread of the virus. Also from Switzerland similar data coming:
https://www.srf.ch/news/schweiz/corona-daten-aus-der-waadt-ungsumpfte-Aden-in-80-ur -Hoeheres infection risk-than-vaccinated
Here, the effectiveness of the Moderna vaccine against infections and hospitalization with that of the BionTech vaccine compared. Both are also very effective against hospitalizations (81% and 75%) compared to Delta, moderna also shows high effectiveness (76%) compared to infections. BionTech has lost some effectiveness here, with an effectiveness of 42% over infections, this vaccine is still a valuable tool against the pandemic.
also KKonnen Booster here remedy. Data from Israel suggest that Biontech also shows a 86% effectiveness in preventing infections with the delta variant after a 3rd vaccine. Similar results also come from the UK:
hier cuts BionTech better, With a VE of about 80% over infections after two cans. AstraZeneca offers a VE of about 70% here, both vaccines are comparable to the protective effect of an already demonstrated Covid-19 infection (72%). and also in Israel it looks similar: Delta reduces the risk an infection "only" still39%, over hospitalizations (88%) and serious illness (91%), but are still very effective.
https://www.google.com/amp/s/www.cnbc. COM / AMP / 2021 / 07/23 / Delta-Varian Pfizer-Covid-Vaccine-39Percent-Effective-in-Israel-Prevents-Severe-Illness.html
In total: there are, Apart from medically justified exceptions, such as severe allergy sufferers, no rational reason can not be vaccinated. These vaccines are the only realistic way out of the pandemic and have the potential to save numerous lives. Thankfully, this is quite the most people, which is why pilling is now increased to more than 75%, trend rising.